Photo of Joshua Gelfand

Joshua Gelfand

Subscribe to Joshua Gelfand's Posts

Josh focuses his practice on advising public and private companies, and private equity clients, in financial and strategic merger and acquisition transactions and executive compensation matters, as well as assisting asset management clients with the structuring, implementation, and administration of carried interest and “phantom” carried interest programs.

Contact:Read more about Joshua Gelfand

Last May, we provided a client alert about a recent federal district court case (Spence v. American Airlines, No. 4:23-cv-00552-O, 2025 WL 225127, at *2 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2025)), in which a plan sponsor and certain plan fiduciaries were found to have breached their ERISA fiduciary duty of loyalty based primarily on conduct related to proxy voting of securities held in certain of the 401(k) plans’ investment funds. At that time, the court left open the question of whether the breach resulted in any damages to the participants.

In our recent client alert, “Texas Federal Court Allows an ERISA Fiduciary Challenge Against Alleged “ESG Investing” Without Any ESG Funds,” we reported that a Texas district court recently upheld Biden-administration Department of Labor (DOL) rules permitting environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations as “tie breakers” in selecting 401(k) plan investments. The district court, following instructions from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, applied a Loper Bright “post-Chevron” analysis to hold that the Biden-era rules were validly issued.

In this installment of our Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Considerations in Mergers and Acquisitions podcast series, Partners Jeffery Banish and Joshua Gelfand discuss many of the complex issues surrounding employee benefits and executive compensation in M&A transactions. They cover key concerns, common pitfalls, and best practices relating to matters that are likely to arise in M&A transactions. Understanding and addressing benefit issues is critical to ensuring that the parties identify the risks and liabilities they may be assuming relating to benefit matters.