In our recent client alert, “Texas Federal Court Allows an ERISA Fiduciary Challenge Against Alleged “ESG Investing” Without Any ESG Funds,” we reported that a Texas district court recently upheld Biden-administration Department of Labor (DOL) rules permitting environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations as “tie breakers” in selecting 401(k) plan investments. The district court, following instructions from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, applied a Loper Bright “post-Chevron” analysis to hold that the Biden-era rules were validly issued.

Well, easy come, easy go. The Trump administration’s DOL has informed the Fifth Circuit that it is reconsidering the ESG investing rule. In a status report filed by the DOL on May 28, 2025, in State of Utah v. Chavez-DeRemer, Docket No. 23-11097 (5th Cir. Oct 30, 2023), the DOL stated that it will “engage in new rulemaking” on this topic. The status report states that this topic will be on the DOL’s spring rulemaking agenda and that the DOL “intends to move through the rulemaking process as expeditiously as possible.”

Interestingly, one of the rationales stated in Loper Bright to reverse Chevron was that Chevron deference too often led to agencies ping-ponging rules from one administration to the next. Here, though, we have a rule that was found to have been validly issued after applying a Loper Bright framework of analysis, but we will still end up with flip-flopping agency positions driven by a change in administrations. For plan sponsors and fiduciaries, all we can do at the present is monitor the ongoing rulemaking process.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of James Earle James Earle

Jim counsels publicly traded companies and other complex employers on matters related to executive compensation. His clients operate globally in a wide range of industries, including financial services, manufacturing, food, telecommunications, utilities and other service-based companies. Jim advises clients on all aspects of…

Jim counsels publicly traded companies and other complex employers on matters related to executive compensation. His clients operate globally in a wide range of industries, including financial services, manufacturing, food, telecommunications, utilities and other service-based companies. Jim advises clients on all aspects of the employment, compensation, benefits and severance of directors, executive officers and other senior managers. He has significant substantive experience with all forms of executive compensation and benefit plans.

Photo of Joshua Gelfand Joshua Gelfand

Josh focuses his practice on advising public and private companies, and private equity clients, in financial and strategic merger and acquisition transactions and executive compensation matters, as well as assisting asset management clients with the structuring, implementation, and administration of carried interest and…

Josh focuses his practice on advising public and private companies, and private equity clients, in financial and strategic merger and acquisition transactions and executive compensation matters, as well as assisting asset management clients with the structuring, implementation, and administration of carried interest and “phantom” carried interest programs.

Photo of Brianna Hourihan Brianna Hourihan

Brianna is an associate in the firm’s Employee Benefits + Executive Compensation Practice Group. She assists clients on all aspects of employee benefit matters, including the design and administration of qualified employee benefit plans, health and welfare plans, cafeteria plans and stock options…

Brianna is an associate in the firm’s Employee Benefits + Executive Compensation Practice Group. She assists clients on all aspects of employee benefit matters, including the design and administration of qualified employee benefit plans, health and welfare plans, cafeteria plans and stock options, and other equity and/or incentive-based compensation plans. She also regularly advises clients on the wide variety of compliance issues that arise in the administration of those plans.